USPTO Information Request Refusal of PARKAI Application
“Under Trademark Rule 2.61(b), ‘he Office may require the applicant to furnish such information . . . as may be reasonab...
USPTO
USPTO 
USPTO Cancellation of EDGE GAMES Registration Due to Nonuse
The evidence here convinces us that Dr. Langdell’s testimony in rebuttal that he used EDGE GAMES as a trademark prior to...
USPTO PALAPA Merely Descriptive of Event Venue Services
To show that a mark has acquired distinctiveness, an applicant must demonstrate that the relevant public understands the...
USPTO HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 3
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently set forth the following “core principles” relevant to determi...
USPTO HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 2
The parties frame as a threshold question whether it is appropriate to use the English translation of Applicants’ mark a...
USPTO HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 1
In articulating reasons for reaching a conclusion on the issue of confusion, there is nothing improper in stating that, ...
USPTO Are T-Shirts and Hats Related to Toy Action Figures?
The evidence provided by the Examining Attorney suggests that toy action figures, tshirts, and hats can be relatively in...
USPTO Is TROOMY for Supplements Confusable with TROOP for Mushroom-Containing Supplements?
We must “give the identified in the application their full scope in our analysis of the second DuPont factor.” On its fa...
USPTO What constitutes a relevant relationship between the goods?
Complementary goods are not always related in a way that increases the likelihood of confusion. What matters is whether ...
USPTO Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 2
The evidence establishes a “reasonable predicate” for finding that Applicant’s Mark is not inherently distinctive, and t...