米国

USPTO

Cancellation of EDGE GAMES Registration Due to Nonuse

The evidence here convinces us that Dr. Langdell’s testimony in rebuttal that he used EDGE GAMES as a trademark prior to...
USPTO

PALAPA Merely Descriptive of Event Venue Services

To show that a mark has acquired distinctiveness, an applicant must demonstrate that the relevant public understands the...
USPTO

HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 3

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently set forth the following “core principles” relevant to determi...
USPTO

HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 2

The parties frame as a threshold question whether it is appropriate to use the English translation of Applicants’ mark a...
USPTO

HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 1

In articulating reasons for reaching a conclusion on the issue of confusion, there is nothing improper in stating that, ...
USPTO

Are T-Shirts and Hats Related to Toy Action Figures?

The evidence provided by the Examining Attorney suggests that toy action figures, tshirts, and hats can be relatively in...
USPTO

Is TROOMY for Supplements Confusable with TROOP for Mushroom-Containing Supplements?

We must “give the identified in the application their full scope in our analysis of the second DuPont factor.” On its fa...
USPTO

Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 1

We generally consider the following factors to determine whether an applicant’s product packaging is inherently distinct...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 4

The Consent Agreement, which was executed on June 1, 2023, does not indicate the period of time of such simultaneous use...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 2

Although the Consent Agreement shows that market participants Registrant and Applicant have affirmatively agreed that Ap...