商標の類否

No reason to assume that the relevant public would perceive the marks as having the same commercial origin even for identical goods – 1

Visually, the signs clearly differ in their structure and length. The earlier mark consists of a single word, ‘ALPA’, wh...

2026.02.04

EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否欧州異議申立結合商標

The registered mark is YOURGUT for yogurt and Applicant’s mark is YOGUT for freezedried yogurt-based snacks. The marks, ...

2026.02.02

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商品の類否商標の類否拒絶理由米国

The application does not contain any limitation on the channels of trade or intended customers and, thus, the potential ...

2026.02.01

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否異議申立米国結合商標

The absence of evidence of actual confusion by itself is entitled to little weight in our likelihood of confusion analys...

2026.01.31

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否異議申立米国

Visually the signs coincide in the verbal element ‘WENDY’S’, which is clearly legible in both signs. As to the stylisati...

2026.01.27

EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否欧州異議申立結合商標

The depiction of a dark swan (in black, grey, and white) strengthens the impact of the dominant literal terms BLACK SWAN...

2026.01.22

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標

The additional wording in each mark, ROOFING and CONTRACTORS, albeit disclaimed, further contributes to differences in s...

2026.01.20

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標

Generally, the principle that there is no correct pronunciation of a mark applies with greater force when one of the mar...

2026.01.19

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国

Here, the evidence shows that U.S. consumers know and recognize Opposer’s mark and associate it with Opposer as the sour...

2026.01.18

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否異議申立米国

Aurally, the signs are identical for the relevant Frech-speaking public under focus.In French, the pronunciation of the ...

2026.01.17

EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否欧州異議申立