USPTO The first Dupont factor weighs in favor of likelihood of confusion
The oval design feature of Applicant’s mark that surrounds the word DSU and frames it, forming a background, does not di...
出所混同のおそれ
USPTO 
EUIPO TOUR DE FRANCE: ‘Tour de’ is too weak to prevent registration of ‘TOUR DE X’
The risk that the public may believe that the goods or services in question come from the same undertaking or from econo...
EUIPO Same letter, different graphical depiction – not enough for likelihood of confusion without the same concept
The Board of Appeal (BoA) notes that the overall visual impression of the signs, even if both are perceived as containin...
USPTO Parody Does Not Implicate First Amendment Concerns, But Only Implicates Likelihood of Confusion
US Supreme Court > Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, decided June 8, 2023We do not decide whether theR...
EUIPO A potential head of damage – dilution
L’Oréal v Bellure (Case C-487/07), CJEUAs regards detriment to the distinctive character of the mark, also referred to a...
インド Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction In Favor Of Bridgestone
Defendant’s mark ‘BRIMESTONE’ is nearly identical to Plaintiff’s mark ‘BRIDGESTONE’. Defendant has not only imitated Pla...
インド Brief Confusion Equals Trademark Infringement
Delhi High Court / Under Armour Inc vs Anish Agarwal & Anr on 23 May, 2025If a customer of average intelligence and impe...