USPTO Is APPARITION Confusable with PHANTOM for Wine? – 1
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that if there is evidence that a mark, or an element of a mar...
USPTO
USPTO 
USPTO Is BATTLE ROYALE GOLF Merely Descriptive of Golf Games?
However, if each component retains its merely descriptive significance in relation to the goods or services, the combina...
USPTO Clothing and Perfume are Related
The Application and Cited Registration identify goods that are not restricted by target market, price, or any other mann...
USPTO Is “GREEN COLLECTIVE” Merely Descriptive of Kitchen Utensils?
The combined terms GREEN and COLLECTIVE are merely descriptive if the individual components retain their descriptive mea...
USPTO Is WORLDWIDECRYPTO Merely Descriptive of Cryptocurrency Exchange Services?
The combination of these individual words into the composite WORLDWIDECRYPTO does not create a unique, incongruous or no...
USPTO Refusal of the mark LITTLE MEXICO for “Take-out restaurant services” [MEXICO disclaimed]
Considering the marks in their entireties, we acknowledge that the marks have some dissimilarities in sound and appearan...
USPTO Extensive Third-Party Use of “SIDECAR”
Commercial strength is a question of “whether consumers in fact associate the … mark with a unique source.” Evidence of ...
USPTO Prove Distinctiveness of its Common Law Mark – 2
Factors to be considered in determining whether acquired distinctiveness has been established include whether there is a...
USPTO Prove Distinctiveness of its Common Law Mark – 1
In sum, we find that Opposer’s evidence of use of PCS prior to Applicant’s December 13, 2018, constructive date of first...
USPTO Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of “THE TRAVELING PAWTOGRAPHERS” for Pet Portrait Photography Services
Based on the evidence of record, we agree with the Examining Attorney that PAWTOGRAPHER refers to a pet photographer, an...