USPTO HABANA BRISA Confusable with HAVANA TAN! for Sun Care Preparations – 1
In articulating reasons for reaching a conclusion on the issue of confusion, there is nothing improper in stating that, ...
TTAB
USPTO 
USPTO Are T-Shirts and Hats Related to Toy Action Figures?
The evidence provided by the Examining Attorney suggests that toy action figures, tshirts, and hats can be relatively in...
USPTO Is TROOMY for Supplements Confusable with TROOP for Mushroom-Containing Supplements?
We must “give the identified in the application their full scope in our analysis of the second DuPont factor.” On its fa...
USPTO What constitutes a relevant relationship between the goods?
Complementary goods are not always related in a way that increases the likelihood of confusion. What matters is whether ...
USPTO Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 2
The evidence establishes a “reasonable predicate” for finding that Applicant’s Mark is not inherently distinctive, and t...
USPTO Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 1
We generally consider the following factors to determine whether an applicant’s product packaging is inherently distinct...
USPTO TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 4
The Consent Agreement, which was executed on June 1, 2023, does not indicate the period of time of such simultaneous use...
USPTO Is “1849 BOURBON” for Distilled Spirits Confusable With “1849” for Wine?
While the addition of the disclaimed BOURBON may be a point of difference in Applicant’s proposed mark in sound when ful...
USPTO Is “TAC-O” Merely Descriptive of Food Seasonings and Cooking-Related Services?
Applicant contends that use of a hyphen in “TAC-O” changes the “O” into an interjection or exclamation, creating a doubl...
USPTO Is KARMA KRACKERS for Crackers Confusable with KARMA for Nuts?
The words KARMA KRACKERS are featured prominently in the center of the mark. Applicant’s composite mark emphasizes the w...