EUIPO APPLE and OPPLE are visually and aurally smilar at least to an average degree – 4
The specific reputation of the earlier mark – including qualitative aspects, such as a particular image (luxury, lifesty...
異議申立
EUIPO 
EUIPO APPLE and OPPLE are visually and aurally smilar at least to an average degree – 2
The Opposition Division applied the relevant legal standard applicable to short marks (typically reserved for two/three ...
EUIPO APPLE and OPPLE are visually and aurally smilar at least to an average degree – 1
Indeed, according to settled case-law, where a figurative mark containing verbal elements is compared visually to a word...
USPTO Is TROOMY for Supplements Confusable with TROOP for Mushroom-Containing Supplements?
We must “give the identified in the application their full scope in our analysis of the second DuPont factor.” On its fa...
EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 3
The graphic component of the earlier right cannot be pronounced, as it has no obvious, clear concept. The term ‘RED’ is ...
EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 2
The fact that the first verbal element of the contested sign ‘REDA’ contains one more letter than the corresponding verb...
EUIPO RED ENERGY Not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 1
The public will not generally consider a descriptive element forming part of a complex mark as the distinctive and domin...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 2
Despite a previous Board decision stating that the term ‘cloud’ is not necessarily understood by all relevant consumers ...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 1
Although the verbal element forming the earlier mark is included at the beginning of the contested mark, or in a positio...
EUIPO “Diamond” is unlikely to be universally perceived as a laudatory element
Assessment of the similarity between two marks means more than taking into consideration just one component of a composi...