商標権侵害

UKIPO

Post-Sale Confusion is Relevant for Establishing Trade Mark Infringement

None of the CJEU authorities support the proposition that actionable infringement should be limited to post-sale confusi...
USPTO

Is BUFFALO CITY for Alcoholic Beverages Confusable with BUFFALO TRACE for Bourbon?

Overall, a net 30.5 percent of respondents are likely to be confused and believe that Buffalo City is from the same comp...
USPTO

Is SEXTO for Alcoholic Beverages Confusable with THE SEXTON for Whiskey?

In every inter partes case, the plaintiff must establish its entitlement to have invoked the statutory proceeding it fil...
シンガポール

Louis Vuitton Counterfeit Case: Singapore Court Decision – 3

Even if the claimant's material was used in the Offending Goods, it still does not change the fact that the Offending Go...
シンガポール

Louis Vuitton Counterfeit Case: Singapore Court Decision – 2

About a month later, the claimant instructed its representative to make a trap purchase of 12 of the Offending Goods. Th...
シンガポール

Louis Vuitton Counterfeit Case: Singapore Court Decision – 1

This judgment deals with the assessment of damages for trade mark infringement where the defendant has used a counterfei...
カナダ

When to sue for trademark infringement

The deadline to start a lawsuit depends on the laws where the infringement took place. For cases where the infringement,...
米国

Enforce Your Intellectual Property Rights at the Border

U.S. Customs and Border Protection > IPR > Best PracticesU.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) is the first line of...
USPTO

Parody Does Not Implicate First Amendment Concerns, But Only Implicates Likelihood of Confusion

US Supreme Court > Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, decided June 8, 2023We do not decide whether theR...
インド

Brief Confusion Equals Trademark Infringement

Delhi High Court / Under Armour Inc vs Anish Agarwal & Anr on 23 May, 2025If a customer of average intelligence and impe...