異議申立

EUIPO

The term ‘CIGALES’ independently evokes the PDO

When consumers encounter the sign applied for, the term ‘CIGALES’ does not go unnoticed. Although there is no likelihood...
EUIPO

RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 3

The graphic component of the earlier right cannot be pronounced, as it has no obvious, clear concept. The term ‘RED’ is ...
EUIPO

RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 2

The fact that the first verbal element of the contested sign ‘REDA’ contains one more letter than the corresponding verb...
EUIPO

RED ENERGY Not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 1

The public will not generally consider a descriptive element forming part of a complex mark as the distinctive and domin...
EUIPO

Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 2

Despite a previous Board decision stating that the term ‘cloud’ is not necessarily understood by all relevant consumers ...
EUIPO

Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 1

Although the verbal element forming the earlier mark is included at the beginning of the contested mark, or in a positio...
EUIPO

“Diamond” is unlikely to be universally perceived as a laudatory element

Assessment of the similarity between two marks means more than taking into consideration just one component of a composi...
USPTO

Is KARMA KRACKERS for Crackers Confusable with KARMA for Nuts?

The words KARMA KRACKERS are featured prominently in the center of the mark. Applicant’s composite mark emphasizes the w...
USPTO

Establishing entitlement to a statutory cause of action for opposition claims

Demonstrating a real interest in opposing registration of a mark satisfies the zone of-interests requirement, and demons...
USPTO

MAIN ESTEEM Not Confusable with MANE ‘N TAIL

Disclaimed matter that is descriptive or generic of a party’s goods or services is typically less significant or less do...