拒絶理由

EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 3

It should be recalled that, according to settled case-law, novelty or originality are not relevant criteria for assessin...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 2

In those circumstances, only a mark which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector and thereby fulfi...
USPTO

Are T-Shirts and Hats Related to Toy Action Figures?

The evidence provided by the Examining Attorney suggests that toy action figures, tshirts, and hats can be relatively in...
USPTO

What constitutes a relevant relationship between the goods?

Complementary goods are not always related in a way that increases the likelihood of confusion. What matters is whether ...
USPTO

Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 2

The evidence establishes a “reasonable predicate” for finding that Applicant’s Mark is not inherently distinctive, and t...
USPTO

Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 1

We generally consider the following factors to determine whether an applicant’s product packaging is inherently distinct...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 4

The Consent Agreement, which was executed on June 1, 2023, does not indicate the period of time of such simultaneous use...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 3

We also consider whether and to what extent the parties have agreed that they will make efforts to prevent confusion and...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 2

Although the Consent Agreement shows that market participants Registrant and Applicant have affirmatively agreed that Ap...
USPTO

TTAB Rejects Flimsy Consent Agreement – 1

The Federal Circuit has provided helpful guidance in determining the probative value of a consent agreement in the form ...