UKIPO Post-Sale Confusion is Relevant for Establishing Trade Mark Infringement
None of the CJEU authorities support the proposition that actionable infringement should be limited to post-sale confusi...
商標権侵害
UKIPO 
USPTO Is BUFFALO CITY for Alcoholic Beverages Confusable with BUFFALO TRACE for Bourbon?
Overall, a net 30.5 percent of respondents are likely to be confused and believe that Buffalo City is from the same comp...
USPTO Is SEXTO for Alcoholic Beverages Confusable with THE SEXTON for Whiskey?
In every inter partes case, the plaintiff must establish its entitlement to have invoked the statutory proceeding it fil...
USPTO Parody Does Not Implicate First Amendment Concerns, But Only Implicates Likelihood of Confusion
US Supreme Court > Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, decided June 8, 2023We do not decide whether theR...
EUIPO A potential head of damage – dilution
L’Oréal v Bellure (Case C-487/07), CJEUAs regards detriment to the distinctive character of the mark, also referred to a...
インド Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction In Favor Of Bridgestone
Defendant’s mark ‘BRIMESTONE’ is nearly identical to Plaintiff’s mark ‘BRIDGESTONE’. Defendant has not only imitated Pla...
インド Brief Confusion Equals Trademark Infringement
Delhi High Court / Under Armour Inc vs Anish Agarwal & Anr on 23 May, 2025If a customer of average intelligence and impe...