EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 3
The graphic component of the earlier right cannot be pronounced, as it has no obvious, clear concept. The term ‘RED’ is ...
商標の類否
EUIPO 
EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 2
The fact that the first verbal element of the contested sign ‘REDA’ contains one more letter than the corresponding verb...
EUIPO RED ENERGY Not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 1
The public will not generally consider a descriptive element forming part of a complex mark as the distinctive and domin...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 2
Despite a previous Board decision stating that the term ‘cloud’ is not necessarily understood by all relevant consumers ...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 1
Although the verbal element forming the earlier mark is included at the beginning of the contested mark, or in a positio...
EUIPO “Diamond” is unlikely to be universally perceived as a laudatory element
Assessment of the similarity between two marks means more than taking into consideration just one component of a composi...
USPTO Is KARMA KRACKERS for Crackers Confusable with KARMA for Nuts?
The words KARMA KRACKERS are featured prominently in the center of the mark. Applicant’s composite mark emphasizes the w...
USPTO Weakness of “BNB” Brings Cancellation Denial
An online association based on proximity is not the same as a trademark inquiry as to the perception of the relevant pub...
USPTO Is M8KIT Confusable with M8 for Clothing?
The existence of third-party registrations on similar goods can bear on a mark’s conceptual strength. Specifically, thir...
EUIPO Verbal element ‘viento’ is clearly secondary in the visual perception of the sign – 2
The signs’ strong similarities stem from their figurative elements depicting an anchor within a circle, drawn up in the ...