商標の類否

EUIPO

Same letter, different graphical depiction – not enough for likelihood of confusion without the same concept

The Board of Appeal (BoA) notes that the overall visual impression of the signs, even if both are perceived as containin...
2025.07.03
EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否欧州異議申立
シンガポール

Similarity of marks

Monster Energy Company v Artisan Boulangerie Compagnie Pte Ltd SGIPOS 8The well-established criteria of visual, aural an...
2025.06.20
シンガポール商標の類否
EUIPO

A potential head of damage – dilution

L’Oréal v Bellure (Case C-487/07), CJEUAs regards detriment to the distinctive character of the mark, also referred to a...
2025.06.19
EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否商標権侵害欧州識別力
インド

Delhi High Court Grants Permanent Injunction In Favor Of Bridgestone

Defendant’s mark ‘BRIMESTONE’ is nearly identical to Plaintiff’s mark ‘BRIDGESTONE’. Defendant has not only imitated Pla...
2025.06.16
インド出所混同のおそれ商標の類否商標権侵害
EUIPO

Proof of use: Colour added, but character unchanged

The use in colour of the mark registered in black and white does not alter the distinctive character of that mark, where...
2025.06.03
EUIPO商標の類否欧州結合商標色商標識別力
EUIPO

Conflict between the design of snack packaging and an earlier trade mark for snacks

The earlier trade mark is a figurative mark consisting of the stylised uppercase letters ‘KRAX’, arranged in descending ...
2025.06.01
EUIPO商標の類否欧州