USPTO Is “1849 BOURBON” for Distilled Spirits Confusable With “1849” for Wine?
While the addition of the disclaimed BOURBON may be a point of difference in Applicant’s proposed mark in sound when ful...
出所混同のおそれ
USPTO 
EUIPO The term ‘CIGALES’ independently evokes the PDO
When consumers encounter the sign applied for, the term ‘CIGALES’ does not go unnoticed. Although there is no likelihood...
EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 3
The graphic component of the earlier right cannot be pronounced, as it has no obvious, clear concept. The term ‘RED’ is ...
EUIPO RED ENERGY is not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 2
The fact that the first verbal element of the contested sign ‘REDA’ contains one more letter than the corresponding verb...
EUIPO RED ENERGY Not Confusable with REDA Energy for energy – 1
The public will not generally consider a descriptive element forming part of a complex mark as the distinctive and domin...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 2
Despite a previous Board decision stating that the term ‘cloud’ is not necessarily understood by all relevant consumers ...
EUIPO Visually and conceptually similar to a below-average degree – 1
Although the verbal element forming the earlier mark is included at the beginning of the contested mark, or in a positio...
EUIPO “Diamond” is unlikely to be universally perceived as a laudatory element
Assessment of the similarity between two marks means more than taking into consideration just one component of a composi...
USPTO MAIN ESTEEM Not Confusable with MANE ‘N TAIL
Disclaimed matter that is descriptive or generic of a party’s goods or services is typically less significant or less do...
USPTO Is M8KIT Confusable with M8 for Clothing?
The existence of third-party registrations on similar goods can bear on a mark’s conceptual strength. Specifically, thir...