出所混同のおそれ

Given the strong visual differences which compensate for the phonetical identity, a likelihood of confusion can be safely excluded

Neither sign has any element that could be considered clearly more dominant than other elements, considering the relativ...

2026.03.10

EUIPO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否図形商標欧州異議申立結合商標

Following the assessment of the inherent distinctiveness of the sign’s single verbal element, the examiner would then ne...

2026.03.08

EUIPO出所混同のおそれ原産地表示商標の類否欧州異議申立識別力

The marks IDEAL CAPITAL GROUP and IDEAL SALE “are visually similar, as both begin with the word” IDEAL. “The second elem...

2026.03.06

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標

There is nothing on the face of the mark to suggest that the word IDEAL is an acronym for “Income, Depreciation, Equity,...

2026.03.05

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標

As for the words, LOTE appears above and in a larger font than MAESTRO, likely emphasizing the connotation of the words ...

2026.03.04

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否無効審判米国結合商標

The word mark THE BULL ATTORNEYS! is more dissimilar than similar in appearance and sound to MICHAEL THE BULL because th...

2026.03.01

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標

It has long been held that the mere fact that two different items can be found in a supermarket, department store, drugs...

2026.02.28

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商品の類否拒絶理由米国

Yet a third way of showing that consumers perceive two types of goods to be related is to show that third-party companie...

2026.02.27

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商品の類否拒絶理由米国

If the goods or services in question are not related or marketed in such a way that they would be encountered by the sam...

2026.02.26

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商品の類否拒絶理由米国

Under the doctrine of foreign equivalents, foreign words from common modern languages are translated into English to det...

2026.02.25

USPTO出所混同のおそれ商標の類否拒絶理由米国結合商標