立体商標

EUIPO

Knowledge of the shapes in the market and the saturation of prior art are not considerations leading to a finding of bad faith – 1

When the shape extends to verbal and figurative elements, its identification and the assessment of its distinctiveness m...
USPTO

Restaurant Interior Designs: Distinctiveness Neither Inherent Nor Acquired – 2

As depicted in Applicant’s specimens and the descriptions of the marks, the Proposed Marks consists of trade dress compr...
USPTO

Restaurant Interior Designs: Distinctiveness Neither Inherent Nor Acquired – 1

We apply the four-part test set forth in the Federal Circuit’s decision in Seabrook to determine whether the trade dress...
EUIPO

It is very unlikely that the color of the product will determine the consumers’ choice

The mere fact that the colour purple was chosen because of its unusual, unique and memorable character must be disregard...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 5

The contested goods mainly target the general public, though they can also target specialised consumers with specific pr...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 4

The relevant public is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect. In this respect, ...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 3

It should be recalled that, according to settled case-law, novelty or originality are not relevant criteria for assessin...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 2

In those circumstances, only a mark which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector and thereby fulfi...
EUIPO

Undistinguishable from the shapes of the same type of goods commonly found in trade – 1

The average consumer’s perception is not necessarily the same in relation to a three-dimensional mark consisting of the ...
USPTO

Is Applicant’s Three-Dimensional Product Packaging Configuration Inherently Distinctive? – 2

The evidence establishes a “reasonable predicate” for finding that Applicant’s Mark is not inherently distinctive, and t...