シンガポール

(iv) When speaking of the assessment of a mark as a whole, the visual, aural or conceptual similarity of the marks in qu...

(i) The three aspects of similarity (i.e. visual, aural and conceptual similarities) are meant to guide the court’s inqu...

No matter how one slices and dices it, the “V” in the Application Mark is a significant differentiating factor. The ambi...

Case law recognises two approaches to the aural similarity assessment. The first is to consider the dominant and distinc...

After all, the perspective to be adopted is that of a notional customer with imperfect recollection. Through that lens, ...

If the name in question is widely known, it is possible that it will only be viewed as the name of the character in the ...

Even if the claimant's material was used in the Offending Goods, it still does not change the fact that the Offending Go...

About a month later, the claimant instructed its representative to make a trap purchase of 12 of the Offending Goods. Th...

This judgment deals with the assessment of damages for trade mark infringement where the defendant has used a counterfei...

Monster Energy Company v Artisan Boulangerie Compagnie Pte Ltd SGIPOS 8The well-established criteria of visual, aural an...